I keep hearing people say cutting corporate taxes is supposed to boost the economy by creating jobs, lowering prices, and raising wages. But when I look around, I don’t see any real evidence of this happening. Instead, it feels like these tax cuts just line the pockets of executives and shareholders.
From what I’ve seen, in places like America and Canada, corporate tax cuts haven’t really led to more investment or job creation. Instead, we see companies using the extra money for stock buybacks, bonuses, or even hiding it in tax havens.
Why would this money ever trickle down to workers? If they can avoid it, why wouldn’t companies just keep the profits for themselves instead of investing in better wages or lowering prices?
What do you think? Is there any solid proof that cutting corporate taxes actually helps everyday people?
@Cassian
It makes sense when you think about it. Corporate taxes ultimately affect both labor and capital, and it’s hard to split the exact burden between them.
Ember said: @Cassian
If the evidence is there, why is cutting corporate taxes still so unpopular? Is it just a PR problem?
People generally misunderstand taxes. I’d actually prefer no corporate taxes at all. Let businesses run efficiently, and then use progressive taxes on personal income to address inequality. But that’s hard to explain to most voters.
Your sources rely heavily on correlation rather than causation. For example, if a country cuts corporate taxes during a recession, you might see weak growth afterward, but that doesn’t mean the tax cut caused the weak growth. Correlation isn’t always causation.
@Darwin
But we’ve been cutting corporate taxes for years, and wages haven’t gone up. Back when taxes were higher, people could afford homes, cars, and families. Now it’s hard just to pay rent. Where’s the benefit for regular workers?
@Vance
You’re pointing out trends, but trends alone don’t prove anything. There could be other factors at play. It’s like blaming air conditioning for heat because it’s always on when it’s hot outside—it’s not the cause.